Strategi dan Kapasitas Inovasi Kebijakan Smart City di Kota Tanjungpinang

  • Chaerey Ranba Sholeh Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Firman Firman Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Okky Rizki Azizi Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Nur Hafifa Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
Keywords: Smart City, Policy Innovation, Governance

Abstract

The Smart City concept offers solutions for local governments to address urban issues. However, implementing the Smart City vision in various cities encounters challenges. In Tanjungpinang City, the Smart City implementation is fragmented and not well-integrated into governance. This research explores the strategy and capacity of the Tanjungpinang City Local Government in realizing Smart City. A descriptive qualitative method is used to understand Smart City policy innovation in Tanjungpinang. The findings indicate the need for regulations focusing on Smart City and stakeholder collaboration. The government must adopt strategies to enhance capacity in Smart City policy innovation, including strengthening stakeholder coordination, increasing community participation, continuous monitoring and evaluation, and providing adequate budget. With proper strategies and capacity building, Tanjungpinang's Smart City is expected to develop optimally, offering tangible benefits to the community, and establishing itself as a smart, advanced, and cultured city.

References

Bekkar, A., Hssina, B., Douzi, S., & Douzi, K. (2021). Air-pollution prediction in smart city, deep learning approach. Journal of Big Data, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00548-1
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
Cohen, S. (1996). Understanding and Applying Innovation Strategies in the Public Sector. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251638326
Conti, D. de M., Camata, S. D. dos S., Sartori, S. V., & Bettini, M. M. (2022). Innovation and sustainable development of smart cities. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 13(4), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179- 3565.2022v13i4p32-44
Crane, D. (1977). Technological innovation in developing countries: a review of the literature. Research Policy, 6(4), 374–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(77)90013-0
Deloitte. (2015). Smart Cities How rapid advances in technology are reshaping our economy and society. www.deloitte.nl/govlab
Han, J. (2020). Can urban sprawl be the cause of environmental deterioration? Based on the provincial panel data in China. Environmental Research, 189, 109954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109954
Holguín Rengifo, Y. X., Herrera Vargas, J. F., & Valencia-Arias, A. (2023). Proposal for a Comprehensive Tool to Measure Smart Cities under the Triple- Helix Model: Capacities Learning, Research, and Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813549
Hurlock, E. B. (1978). Child psychology. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, Ltd.
Kim, H. M., Sabri, S., & Kent, A. (2020). Smart cities as a platform for technological and social innovation in productivity, sustainability, and livability: A conceptual framework. In Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation: Case Studies, Current Trends, and Future Steps (pp. 9–28). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818886-6.00002-2
Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol.25, Juni 2012, 93-95. Routledge
LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001). DEVELOPING INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN ORGANISATIONS: A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES APPROACH. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(03), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919601000427
Malcolm, K., Tilden, M., & Wilsdon, T. (2009). Evaluation of the economic impacts of the Financial Services Action Plan. CRA International report prepared for the European Commission, Internal Market and Services DG.
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072100
Porumb,E.M.,&Ivanova,N.V.(2014).DevelopmentthroughKnowledgeEconomy:Cluj-Napoca–a European Smart City. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 453.
Scytl.(2015). Scytl Smart Governance for Smart Cities. Setiawan, H. (2013). Metode Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi
Sholeh, C., Sintaningrum, & Sugandi, Y. S. (2019). Formulation of Innovation Policy: Case of Bandung Smart City. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/JSP.33698
Taylor Buck, N., & While, A. (2017). Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative. Urban Studies, 54(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015597162
Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049 UNESCO science report the race against time for smarter development. (n.d.).
Wang, J., & Deng, K. (2022). Impact and mechanism analysis of smart city policy on urban innovation: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 574–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.12.006
Xu, Q., & Wu, Z. (2012). A study on strategy schema for smart cities based on the innovation driven. 2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679483
Published
2024-08-31
How to Cite
Sholeh, C. R., Firman, F., Azizi, O. R., & Hafifa, N. (2024). Strategi dan Kapasitas Inovasi Kebijakan Smart City di Kota Tanjungpinang. Jurnal Administrasi Politik Dan Sosial, 5(2), 236-254. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v5i2.145
View
Abstract viewed = 113
Download
downloaded = 0