Strategi dan Kapasitas Inovasi Kebijakan Smart City di Kota Tanjungpinang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v5i2.145Kata Kunci:
Smart City, Inovasi Kebijakan, Tata Kelola PemerintahanAbstrak
Konsep Smart City menjadi solusi bagi pemerintah daerah dalam menghadapi permasalahan perkotaan. Namun, realisasi visi Smart City di berbagai kota masih menemui kendala. Di Kota Tanjungpinang, implementasi Smart City masih terfragmentasi dan belum terintegrasi dengan baik dalam tata kelola pemerintahan. Penelitian ini mengkaji strategi dan kapasitas Pemerintah Daerah Kota Tanjungpinang dalam mewujudkan Smart City. Metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif digunakan untuk memahami strategi dan kapasitas inovasi kebijakan Smart City di Tanjungpinang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa diperlukan regulasi yang berfokus pada Smart City serta kolaborasi antara pemangku kepentingan. Pemerintah perlu menjalankan strategi untuk meningkatkan kapasitas dalam melaksanakan inovasi kebijakan Smart City meliputi penguatan koordinasi dan kolaborasi antar pemangku kepentingan, peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat, monitoring dan evaluasi yang berkelanjutan, serta penyediaan anggaran yang memadai. Dengan penerapan strategi dan peningkatan kapasitas yang tepat, Smart City Tanjungpinang diharapkan dapat berkembang optimal dan memberikan manfaat nyata bagi masyarakat, mewujudkannya sebagai kota yang cerdas, maju, dan berbudaya.
Referensi
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
Cohen, S. (1996). Understanding and Applying Innovation Strategies in the Public Sector. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251638326
Conti, D. de M., Camata, S. D. dos S., Sartori, S. V., & Bettini, M. M. (2022). Innovation and sustainable development of smart cities. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 13(4), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179- 3565.2022v13i4p32-44
Crane, D. (1977). Technological innovation in developing countries: a review of the literature. Research Policy, 6(4), 374–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(77)90013-0
Deloitte. (2015). Smart Cities How rapid advances in technology are reshaping our economy and society. www.deloitte.nl/govlab
Han, J. (2020). Can urban sprawl be the cause of environmental deterioration? Based on the provincial panel data in China. Environmental Research, 189, 109954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109954
Holguín Rengifo, Y. X., Herrera Vargas, J. F., & Valencia-Arias, A. (2023). Proposal for a Comprehensive Tool to Measure Smart Cities under the Triple- Helix Model: Capacities Learning, Research, and Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813549
Hurlock, E. B. (1978). Child psychology. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, Ltd.
Kim, H. M., Sabri, S., & Kent, A. (2020). Smart cities as a platform for technological and social innovation in productivity, sustainability, and livability: A conceptual framework. In Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation: Case Studies, Current Trends, and Future Steps (pp. 9–28). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818886-6.00002-2
Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol.25, Juni 2012, 93-95. Routledge
LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001). DEVELOPING INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN ORGANISATIONS: A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES APPROACH. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(03), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919601000427
Malcolm, K., Tilden, M., & Wilsdon, T. (2009). Evaluation of the economic impacts of the Financial Services Action Plan. CRA International report prepared for the European Commission, Internal Market and Services DG.
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072100
Porumb,E.M.,&Ivanova,N.V.(2014).DevelopmentthroughKnowledgeEconomy:Cluj-Napoca–a European Smart City. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 453.
Scytl.(2015). Scytl Smart Governance for Smart Cities. Setiawan, H. (2013). Metode Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi
Sholeh, C., Sintaningrum, & Sugandi, Y. S. (2019). Formulation of Innovation Policy: Case of Bandung Smart City. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/JSP.33698
Taylor Buck, N., & While, A. (2017). Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative. Urban Studies, 54(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015597162
Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049 UNESCO science report the race against time for smarter development. (n.d.).
Wang, J., & Deng, K. (2022). Impact and mechanism analysis of smart city policy on urban innovation: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 574–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.12.006
Xu, Q., & Wu, Z. (2012). A study on strategy schema for smart cities based on the innovation driven. 2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679483
