Analisis Efektivitas Program Gerakan Sumatera Selatan Mandiri Pangan (GSMP) dalam Penguatan Ketahanan Pangan dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan: Evaluasi Implementasi dan Dampak (2021-2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v6i3.316Keywords:
community empowerment, food security, multidimensional poverty, GSMPAbstract
This study analyses the effectiveness of GSMP (social capital-based empowerment programmes) on food security and poverty alleviation in South Sumatra. The methods employed were a systematic review of 34 studies and secondary data analysis. The results revealed three main mechanisms of social capital: information exchange; access to resources; and social support. Implementing GSMP successfully increased the Food Security Index by 54% and reduced the Multidimensional Poverty Index by 59.7%. Supporting factors for success included a participatory approach and institutional strengthening. The main challenges were elite capture, limited infrastructure and policy misalignment. The study concluded that GSMPs are effective in creating sustainable impacts when supported by contextual design and long-term commitment.
References
Agustino, L. (2020). Dasar-dasar kebijakan publik. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Arifin, B. (2019). Diagnosis and problems of rice policy transition in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 16(1), 1-18.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Malghan, D. (2006). On the relationship between scale, allocation, and distribution: A case study of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Ecological Economics, 57(3), 350-367.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Lancaster University.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil's Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173-190.
Syahyuti. (2020). Kelembagaan pertanian dan pembangunan pedesaan di Indonesia: Konsep, kebijakan, dan implementasi. Jakarta: IAARD Press.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488.
Zhang, X., & Donaldson, J. A. (2010). From laborers to landowners: Decades of reform in a Beijing suburb. The China Quarterly, 204, 846-871.
