Analisis Efektivitas Program Gerakan Sumatera Selatan Mandiri Pangan (GSMP) dalam Penguatan Ketahanan Pangan dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan: Evaluasi Implementasi dan Dampak (2021-2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v6i3.316Kata Kunci:
pemberdayaan masyarakat, ketahanan pangan, kemiskinan ultidimensi, GSMPAbstrak
Penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas program pemberdayaan berbasis modal sosial (GSMP) terhadap ketahanan pangan dan pengentasan kemiskinan di Sumatera Selatan. Metode yang digunakan adalah systematic review terhadap 34 studi dan analisis data sekunder. Hasil penelitian mengungkap tiga mekanisme utama modal sosial: pertukaran informasi, akses sumber daya, dan dukungan sosial. Implementasi GSMP berhasil meningkatkan Indeks Ketahanan Pangan sebesar 54% dan menurunkan Indeks Kemiskinan Multidimensi sebesar 59,7%. Faktor pendukung keberhasilan meliputi pendekatan partisipatif dan penguatan kelembagaan, sedangkan tantangan utamanya adalah elite capture, infrastruktur terbatas, dan ketidakselarasan kebijakan. Simpulan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa GSMP efektif menciptakan dampak berkelanjutan ketika didukung desain kontekstual dan komitmen jangka panjang.
Referensi
Agustino, L. (2020). Dasar-dasar kebijakan publik. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Arifin, B. (2019). Diagnosis and problems of rice policy transition in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 16(1), 1-18.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Malghan, D. (2006). On the relationship between scale, allocation, and distribution: A case study of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Ecological Economics, 57(3), 350-367.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Lancaster University.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil's Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173-190.
Syahyuti. (2020). Kelembagaan pertanian dan pembangunan pedesaan di Indonesia: Konsep, kebijakan, dan implementasi. Jakarta: IAARD Press.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488.
Zhang, X., & Donaldson, J. A. (2010). From laborers to landowners: Decades of reform in a Beijing suburb. The China Quarterly, 204, 846-871.
